pbst goat polyclonal igg pax2 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Pbst Goat Polyclonal Igg Pax2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 54 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pbst goat polyclonal igg pax2/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 54 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "An In Vitro Oxidative Stress Model of the Human Inner Ear Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Otic Progenitor Cells"
Article Title: An In Vitro Oxidative Stress Model of the Human Inner Ear Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Otic Progenitor Cells
Journal: Antioxidants
doi: 10.3390/antiox13111407
Figure Legend Snippet: Derivation and characterization of OPCs from hiPSCs. ( a ) Scheme illustrating the generation of OPCs from hiPSCs and corresponding stages of human development. hiPSCs resemble the inner cell mass (ICM), while OPCs correspond to the otocyst stage. ( b ) Representative bright-field images of SK8-A hiPSCs on day 0 and derived OPCs on day 20. Scale bars, 100 µm. ( c ) qRT-PCR data showing fold changes in mRNA expression of otic-related markers ( PAX2 , PAX8 , and GATA3 ) in OPCs compared to hiPSCs. The expression levels in hiPSCs were set to 1. Mean ± SD; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. ( d ) Representative immunocytochemistry images showing protein expression of otic lineage markers in OPCs. hiPSCs were used as negative controls to verify the absence of false-positive signals. Scale bars, 100 µm. Abbreviations: PAX2 , paired box 2; PAX8 , paired box 8; GATA3 , GATA binding protein 3. See “Statistical analysis and reproducibility” in for statistics and experimental information.
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Immunocytochemistry, Binding Assay
![(A and B) Intrathecal NA (A, 0.1 nmol) or Phe (B, 0.05 nmol)-induced mechanical hypersensitivity in control ( Adra1a flox/flox ) and Vgat + IN-selective α 1A R conditional knockout mice [ Vgat-Cre ; Adra1a flox/flox mice (Vgat + INs–α 1A R cKO mice)] (n = 6 mice per group; two-way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test; n.s., not significant). (C) Changes in PWT after acute exposure to restraint stress in control ( Adra1a flox/flox ; n = 6 mice) and Vgat + INs–α 1A R cKO mice ( n = 9 mice) (two-way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test). (D) Representative trace of membrane potentials in tdTomato + (Vgat + ) SDH neurons after application of NA (20 μM) to spinal cord slices from Vgat-Cre ; Rosa-tdTomato mice. A 1 R agonist CPA (1 μM) was co-applied with NA. (E) Percentage of Vgat + SDH neurons whose NA-evoked response was inhibited by CPA ( n = 10 cells from 7 mice). (F) Representative images of Adora1 (A 1 R) mRNA expression (green) in Slc32a1 (Vgat) + INs (magenta). DAPI staining is shown in gray. Arrowheads indicate A 1 R-expressing Vgat + cells. Scale bar, 25 μm. (G) SaCas9 (yellow, detected by HA-tag) and mCherry (magenta) expression in the <t>PAX2</t> + INs (cyan) at 3 weeks after intra-SDH injection of AAV-flex[SaCas9] and AAV-flex[mCherry]-U6-sgAdora1 in Vgat-Cre mice. Arrowheads indicate genome-editing Vgat + cells. Scale bar, 25 μm. (H) Representative traces of membrane potentials in Vgat + INs after application of NA and CPA to spinal cord slices from Vgat-Cre mice with conditional knockdown of A 1 Rs in Vgat + INs (SDH-Vgat + IN–A 1 R cKD) and their controls (Control; Vgat-Cre mice with intra-SDH injection of AAV-flex[mCherry]). (I) Percentage of mCherry + (Vgat + ) SDH neurons whose NA-evoked response was inhibited by CPA (Control, n = 10 cells from 8 mice; SDH-Vgat + IN–A 1 R cKD, n = 8 cells from 5 mice). (J) Expression of hM3Dq (green, detected by HA-tag) in the SDH at 3 weeks after intra-SDH injection of AAV-flex[hM3Dq] in Hes5-CreERT2 mice treated with TAM. Dashed line indicates an outline of the gray matter of SDH. GFAP (magenta, bottom left), SOX9 (magenta, bottom right). Arrowheads indicate HA-tag + astrocytes. Scale bars, 200 μm (top) and 25 μm (bottom). (K and L) Representative traces of sIPSCs (K) and quantitative analysis of their frequency (L) in SG neurons in spinal cord slices from Hes5-CreERT2 ;AAV-hM3Dq mice treated with TAM [Pre and CNO: before and after bath application of CNO (100 μM), respectively] ( n = 7 cells from 7 mice; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; * P < 0.05). (M and N) Representative traces of sIPSCs (M) and quantitative analysis of their frequency (N) in SG neurons in spinal cord slices from Hes5-CreERT2 ;AAV-flex[hM3Dq] mice treated with TAM [Pre and CNO: before and after bath application of CNO with CPT (1 μM), respectively] ( n = 13 cells from 13 mice; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; n.s., not significant). Data represent mean ± SEM.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_27/10__1101_slash_2024__11__14__623627/10__1101_slash_2024__11__14__623627___F3.large.jpg)